<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Distributed Power Management: Improved Efficiency or Playing with Fire?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chriswolf.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203</link>
	<description>Not so random musings of a Gartner analyst</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:11:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Varrow Blogs &#187; Saving Power with vSphere</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203&#038;cpage=1#comment-46850</link>
		<dc:creator>Varrow Blogs &#187; Saving Power with vSphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203#comment-46850</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Wolf [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Wolf [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saving Power with vSphere &#171; Jason Nash&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203&#038;cpage=1#comment-46661</link>
		<dc:creator>Saving Power with vSphere &#171; Jason Nash&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203#comment-46661</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Wolf [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Wolf [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware Launches the V Series Mainframe &#171; Chris Wolf&#8217;s Virtualization Tips and Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203&#038;cpage=1#comment-44964</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Launches the V Series Mainframe &#171; Chris Wolf&#8217;s Virtualization Tips and Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203#comment-44964</guid>
		<description>[...] had blogged on DPM back in November, and while the post incited some strong vendor reaction, it served its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had blogged on DPM back in November, and while the post incited some strong vendor reaction, it served its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203&#038;cpage=1#comment-36343</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203#comment-36343</guid>
		<description>Good catch, Craig, and thanks for pointing that out. We talked about the standby vs. cold boot impact on server resources (power supply, drives, memory, etc.) internally and while you&#039;re right about the difference, the impact on server resources between coming out of standby and a cold boot is effectively the same. Drue Reeves, a guy I highly respect, was deeply involved in these issues at Dell, HP, and Compaq. My stance has never been that DPM is a bad thing. I don&#039;t think that anyone would argue against it being in our not too distant future. I, along with my colleagues at Burton Group, are asking the IHVs to step up and fully support some form of active power management. The good news is that the attention this blog post has generated over the last few weeks is having an impact. I&#039;ve heard positive updates (so far under NDA) for more than one virtualization vendor as well as from a couple of hardware vendors. Hardware vendors that I&#039;ve recently spoken with feel that active power management (e.g. running system resources at a reduced frequency) instead of powering them down (or placing them in standby mode) may become the vendor-recommended solution. Of course, time will tell soon enough. In the mean time, our clients would like some reassurance from the hardware vendors that deploying any time of dynamic power management on a large scale would not void their service contracts or associated warranties. Some have noted that tests in the field have yielded positive results. Still, it&#039;s not too much to ask for the server hardware vendors to simply give their clients what they&#039;re looking for - a simple statement saying they will support VMware DPM, and will fully honor service contracts and warranties in environments that use DPM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch, Craig, and thanks for pointing that out. We talked about the standby vs. cold boot impact on server resources (power supply, drives, memory, etc.) internally and while you&#8217;re right about the difference, the impact on server resources between coming out of standby and a cold boot is effectively the same. Drue Reeves, a guy I highly respect, was deeply involved in these issues at Dell, HP, and Compaq. My stance has never been that DPM is a bad thing. I don&#8217;t think that anyone would argue against it being in our not too distant future. I, along with my colleagues at Burton Group, are asking the IHVs to step up and fully support some form of active power management. The good news is that the attention this blog post has generated over the last few weeks is having an impact. I&#8217;ve heard positive updates (so far under NDA) for more than one virtualization vendor as well as from a couple of hardware vendors. Hardware vendors that I&#8217;ve recently spoken with feel that active power management (e.g. running system resources at a reduced frequency) instead of powering them down (or placing them in standby mode) may become the vendor-recommended solution. Of course, time will tell soon enough. In the mean time, our clients would like some reassurance from the hardware vendors that deploying any time of dynamic power management on a large scale would not void their service contracts or associated warranties. Some have noted that tests in the field have yielded positive results. Still, it&#8217;s not too much to ask for the server hardware vendors to simply give their clients what they&#8217;re looking for &#8211; a simple statement saying they will support VMware DPM, and will fully honor service contracts and warranties in environments that use DPM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203&#038;cpage=1#comment-36283</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203#comment-36283</guid>
		<description>Sorry but I had to nitpick.

SNIP
I’m not convinced that fully shutting down physical hosts is the solution.
/SNIP

DPM tosses a host into standby not fully shutting them down. It&#039;s not Cold-Booting but more like a warm reload.

Just an FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but I had to nitpick.</p>
<p>SNIP<br />
I’m not convinced that fully shutting down physical hosts is the solution.<br />
/SNIP</p>
<p>DPM tosses a host into standby not fully shutting them down. It&#8217;s not Cold-Booting but more like a warm reload.</p>
<p>Just an FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professional VMware &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on VMware DPM and MTBF</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203&#038;cpage=1#comment-35862</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional VMware &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on VMware DPM and MTBF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203#comment-35862</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Wolf - http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Wolf &#8211; <a href="http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203" rel="nofollow">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTFM Education &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VMware Distributed Power Management, my take on it&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203&#038;cpage=1#comment-35822</link>
		<dc:creator>RTFM Education &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VMware Distributed Power Management, my take on it&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203#comment-35822</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203" rel="nofollow">http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=203</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
