Posts Tagged vmworld
VMworld 2010 Session Voting
Posted by Chris in Cloud, Desktop Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Speaking Events on May 16th, 2010
I submitted four proposals for this year’s VMworld conference and learned that three of them are up for voting. I think the fourth is in a VMworld black hole. I wasn’t notified that it was accepted and it’s not up for voting either. I guess I’ll know soon enough… If you’re curious, that proposed session was titled “Private Cloud Security: Vendor Secrets and Hypervisor Competitive Differences.”
Anyway, if you’re not tired of my jokes and would like to see more of me at VMworld North America or VMworld Europe, you can vote for my sessions online. Note that you will need to register for a VMworld.com account if you don’t have one already.
Here are the descriptions of my sessions that are up for voting.
Server-hosted Virtual Desktops: What the Vendors Aren’t Telling You
Many organizations are beginning to implement or plan server-hosted virtual desktop solutions. Vendor platform assessments in the emerging client virtualization market are often difficult due to a lack of defined acceptable standards. In this session, Burton senior analyst Chris Wolf and analyst Simon Bramfitt share Burton Group’s benchmark for evaluating server-hosted virtual desktop solutions, including criteria for evaluating a solution’s deployment, management, performance, integration, and user experience capabilities. The session concludes with a breakdown and scorecards of popular vendor solutions, including the current Citrix and VMware products.
Simon Bramfitt and I will repeat and expand on our session from Citrix Synergy and will include analysis of Microsoft VDI and Quest vWorkspace in addition to VMware View and Citrix XenDesktop. If time permits we will assess more products too. You can vote for this session here. If you search for “Simon Bramfitt” you will find the session. I’m note sure why my name isn’t listed, but assume the voting system only accommodates one speaker.
Extreme Makeover: Data Protection Edition
Applying legacy data protection architectures to today’s heavily virtualized modern data center comes at a significant price in terms of both performance and consolidation density. We are at a time where organizations should reevaluate existing data protection practices and leverage new technologies to improve data recovery and lessen or eliminate the performance tax posed by many existing data protection architectures. This session breaks down modern VM data protection solutions, including VMware’s vStorage API for Data Protection, array-level snapshots and replication, and third party enterprise backup software solutions. Attendees will be exposed to common data protection pitfalls as well as successful blueprints for modern VMware data protection architectures. Chris Wolf has been architecting data protection solutions for enterprise virtualization environments since 2002 and includes an abundance of lessons learned and best practices drawn from real world implementations in this session.
You can vote for this session here.
Cloud Futures: The Infrastructure Authority
To realize the potential of private cloud, infrastructure must be capable of not just dynamically provisioning and optimizing systems, but also not violating any security, regulatory, or organizational policy constraints in the process. In many enterprise environments, dynamic IT consists of several disjointed solutions and oftentimes blind faith that policy, security, or regulatory constraints will not be broken. The bottom line – someone has to be in charge. The infrastructure authority (IA) is the future nerve center of cloud infrastructure as a service (IaaS) operations. Among the many roles the IA possesses are:
- Provides a central metadata store
- Leverages common data models to request or offer services
- Maintains physical, virtual, and policy dependency maps
- Ensures security and regulatory compliance
- Ensures that service level requirements are met
- Stores and enforces organizational policy
- Ensures accurate capacity forecasts
- Integrates with third party management and orchestration tools to authorize IT operations such as provisioning or relocation before they proceed
Typical questions answered by the IA include:
- Are security zoning rules checked before live migrating a VM?
- Do any policy restrictions prevent VMs from migrating to different data centers or to public cloud infrastructure?
This session takes a practical look at the emerging role of the IA, and details how existing management frameworks such as VMware vCenter and industry standards such as OVF can be used in this capacity moving forward.
You can vote for this session here.
Thoughts on the VMworld Day 2 Keynote
Posted by Chris in Cloud, Desktop Virtualization, ESX, Network Virtualization, Security, Server Virtualization, VMware, VMware CVP on September 3rd, 2009
I was very impressed by the information disseminated in the second VMworld keynote, led by CTO Steve Herrod. Here’s a summary of the thoughts I tweeted during the morning keynote (in chronological order).
- Steve Herrod talked about a “people centric” approach. VMware’s technology needs to understand desktop user behavior. The existing offline VDI model (requiring a manual “check-out”) is not people centric.
- VMware’s announcement to OEM RTO Software’s Virtual Profiles was a good move. Burton Group considers profile virtualization a required element of enterprise desktop virtualization architecture.
- VMware’s Steve Herrod and Mike Coleman discussed VMware’s software-based PC-over-IP (PCoIP) protocol. Feedback from Burton Group clients who were early PCoIP beta testers indicates that the protocol’s development is progressing well.
- Herrod showed a picture of “hosted virtualization” for employee owned PCs on a MacBook. Is that a hint of a forthcoming announcement?
- I would like to know if VMware’s Type I CVP client hypervisor will have VMsafe-like support in the 1.0 release. VMware has made few public statements regarding CVP architecture.
- VMware’s CVP demo looked good, but it didn’t reach the “wow factor” achieved by Citrix when Citrix demoed a type I client hypervisor on a Mac at their Synergy conference.
- The Wyse PocketCloud demonstration was impressive. PocketCloud is VMware’s first answer to the Citrix Receiver for iPhone.
- VMware demonstrated the execution of a Google Android application on a Windows Mobile-based smart phone. Many opportunities exist for VMware and Google to collaborate in the user service and application delivery space.
- Burton Group client experience backs VMware’s claims that vSphere 4.0 is a suitable platform for tier 1 applications. We recommend that x86 virtualization be the default platform for all newly deployed x86 applications, unless an application owner can justify why physical hardware is required (e.g., for a proprietary interface that is unsupported by virtualization).
- To support tier 1 application dynamic load balancing, storage and network I/O must be included in the DRS VM placement calculations. It’s good to see that VMware is heading in that direction. DRS will also need to evaluate non-performance metrics such as vShield Zone membership as part of the VM placement metric (no word on this yet).
- I would like to hear more from folks who have tested AppSpeed. Burton Group clients I have spoken with to date have not been impressed.
- The DMTF needs to start doing more to evangelize the role of OVF as it pertains to cloud computing and service manifests.
- I like vSphere’s VMsafe security API, but I want to see tighter integration with external management (exposed via the SDK), and better integration with VMware’s DRS and DPM services.
- VMware talked about Lab Manager as a tool to promote user self-service for server VMs and applications, but I haven’t heard mention of a similar interface for desktop applications (like Citrix Dazzle). A user application service catalog is a missing part of VMware’s current virtual desktop architecture, and will need to be addressed by either VMware or a third party.
- The data center on the show floor running 37,248 VMs on 776 physical servers would be more impressive if VMware disclosed the applications running on the VMs, along with the application workloads. Otherwise, the demonstration is really just a density science project.
- I liked VMware’s coverage of virtual data centers. They are also defined in Burton Group’s internal cloud hardware infrastructure as a service (HIaaS) reference architecture.
- Herrod mentioned forthcoming network L3 improvements that will make it easier to separate location and identity. This is something to follow.
- Both Cisco and F5 are enablers for VMware’s long distance VMotion and are vendors to follow as this technology further matures.
- VMware’s cloud layered architecture is very similar to the architecture defined in the Drue Reeves’ report “Cloud Computing: Transforming IT.”
- Herrod did a great job articulating the importance of SpringSource to the VMware software solution. VMware needs an application platform to have a chance at holding off Microsoft long term, and SpringSource gives them that.
That’s it for my thoughts on day 2. As always, I’d love to hear your feedback. VMworld 2009 was a great conference. I enjoyed my time meeting with Burton Group clients as well as the several conversations that I had with many attendees. See you next year!
VMworld Day 1 Keynote – A Few Thoughts
Posted by Chris in Cloud, Desktop Virtualization, Server Virtualization, VMware on September 2nd, 2009
VMworld got off to a strong start yesterday, with the Paul Maritz keynote setting an early tone for the day’s events. I used twitter to add commentary to the keynote and plan to do the same today for Steve Herrod’s morning keynote. Below is a summary of my thoughts/tweets on the day 1 keynote.
- VMware’s clear goal is to provide a complete platform for cloud-based computing. I’m hopeful that VMware will spend more time helping customers build internal clouds, which focuses on their immediate needs. Public clouds, while intriguing, is a future initiative for most Burton Group clients.
- Paul Maritz and VMware talk about vSphere as an enabler for choice; however, “choice” is a subjective word. To VMware, choice means choice of cloud providers. To others, choice means choice of virtualization platforms.
- vSphere is a foundation for internal cloud, but to keep it in perspective, it’s just the foundation at this point. VMware and its partners need to build the walls. Improvements such as tighter integration between DRS, DPM, orchestration, and security zoning (i.e., vShield Zones) need to be made. vSphere APIs need to further evolve to communicate logical and physical zoning restrictions from either vShield Zones or VMsafe-enabled appliances to management and automation tools.
- I was glad to see Maritz bring up context switching and its impact on x86 virtualizaiton. Many virtualization consolidation planning tools miss analyzing applications with high context switching and don’t consider it when determining VM placement. This oversight in planning tools can cause post-deployment performance problems.
- Martiz clearly demonstrated his command of the VMware product suite and partner integration avenues. He’s a very technical CEO and his knowledge resonates well with the VMware user base.
- The IBM demonstration of vSphere integration with hardware-assisted virtualization active power management was impressive. Many of our clients are looking at exploiting the Enhanced Intel SpeedStep and Enhanced AMD PowerNow! hardware technologies to save on power and cooling costs.
- Maritz highlighted the importance of chargeback and service catalogs in cloud computing, and I agree. I discussed the importance of both of these technologies in the blog post “Cloud and the Wal-Martification of IT.”
- vCenter Chargeback is a good first step, but I think it falls short of giving IT the complete picture of available capacity. Awareness of factors such as security zoning restrictions is required before vCenter Chargeback will accurately forecast available capacity across an enterprise ESX infrastructure.
- Paul Maritz discussed the concept of a virtual data center. Burton Group agrees with this, as we’ve had virtual data centers in our hardware infrastructure as a service (HIaaS) reference architecture for several months. You can learn more about it here.
- VMware’s running tally of more than 1,000 service provider partners is impressive, but I would like to see increased guidance for customers on how to build out internal clouds.
- VMware submitted the vCloud API to the DMTF – a first step toward making the vCloud API an industry standard. That being said, VMware’s competitors would need to adopt the API for it to be a true standard. A standard with one implementation isn’t a true standard, but rather is a proprietary technology, but with good marketing.
- I liked the vCloud Express demo, but would also like to see a service interface on the front end. I like the option of provisioning a server, but would also like to see a demo of the vCloud Express showing an interface that makes sense for the application developer or business professional.
- Rod Johnson did a tremendous job with the SpringSource demo. Giving application owners an interface to provision an app locally, or to an internal or external cloud was spot-on. IT service delivery requires IT operations to give application owners and individual business units interfaces that they understand. Hyperic is also a key part of an integrated VMware cloud stack and is a technology VMware shops should begin working with in their labs.
That’s it for day 1. I’ll post analysis of the Steve Herrod keynote next.
Cloud and the Wal-Martification of IT
Posted by Chris in Cloud, Server Virtualization on August 28th, 2009
A couple of months ago I started sharing a concept with some colleagues and Burton Group clients that I called The Wal-Martification of IT. With the expectation of a large focus on cloud at next week’s VMworld North America conference, I thought now would be a good time to discuss this concept publicly.
The industry is never short on Wal-Mart metaphors – CIO.com’s Bernard Golden just highlighted his own last week. In his article, Golden does a very nice job discussing IT supply chains as they relate to internal cloud. In my talks with clients I’ve used the Wal-Mart metaphor from a different angle.
At Catalyst, I told a story of two anonymous factory workers – let’s call them Laverne and Shirley. There was a time where many folks could work an entire career at the same factory. In many industrialized nations, that’s no longer the case. Manufacturing jobs have moved overseas and factory workers were left to retrain and launch new careers. If you consider the momentum behind public cloud, the IT worker in the local company data center should see this as a threat that puts him on the same career trajectory of the modern day factory worker.
How does Wal-Mart fit into the equation? Think of public cloud providers as the neighborhood Wal-Mart. In many towns across the US, small businesses were swallowed by Wal-Mart. Many of these businesses were unwilling or unable to change their existing business processes or target markets in the wake of Wal-Mart’s entrance to their community. At the same time, Wal-Mart doesn’t exist in ghost towns. Look around most Wal-Marts and you’ll still see plenty of successful businesses.
That leads us back to public cloud. Like it or not, public cloud as a platform for enterprise IT infrastructure is coming. Issues such as concerns over regulatory and security compliance will keep many public cloud alternatives at bay for the immediate future or limit its use to non-critical applications. However, those concerns will be solved through both technology and policy. By conservative estimates, public cloud will be a viable alternative for most business applications in the next 5-10 years. This means that the clock is ticking.
When a business unit compares the cost of running an application via internal IT to that of running it with a public cloud provider, the costs had better be close. In many cases the internal solution will need to cost 20% less than the outsourced cloud solution in order to be economically viable. If the cost of internal hosting is equal to or higher than that of the external solution, all bets are off.
The days of business units buying physical assets and IT managing those assets are terminal. IT organizations should be motivated to work on cloud-based internal infrastructure like their jobs depend on it, because in my opinion they do.
So what should you do? Here’s some food for thought. If you’re going to VMworld next week, engage the cloud service providers. Yes they’re your enemy, but at the same time your friend. IT organizations can get more efficient by leveraging public cloud resources where the solution fits. At the same time, these cloud providers may one day directly target your individual business units, if they are not already.
Service-oriented delivery of IT infrastructure will require organizations to change many traditional practices. To be a cloud, IT must own the organization’s physical assets. Changing existing business procurement processes may be one of the most painful steps on the path toward internal cloud, but it’s also the most necessary.
IT services and user self-service requires a service catalog. The time is now to rethink the traditional service catalog models and look at the service catalog in business terms (that’s how competing public cloud providers target individual business units). Vendors will be showcasing their service catalog models on the VMworld show floor next week, and it is a good idea to spend some time with them.
Service-oriented IT and internal cloud adoption will also be highly disruptive to your existing billing and chargeback mechanisms. Take some time to evaluate chargeback solutions. Even if you start with “show back” as a means to communicate the cost of IT to internal business units, that’s a good first step toward chargeback.
Business and IT process realignment is never fun and often at the bottom of most folks’ to-do lists. However, it’s not something to continue putting off for a rainy day. Public cloud’s day is coming and Wal-Mart-like cloud providers aren’t far behind. Re-architect for internal cloud and IT service-oriented delivery like your job depends on it. It does.







Recent Comments